The 4-year crypto cycle has been a staple of Bitcoin investing, but 2025 presents a new set of macroeconomic and institutional factors reshaping the market. Here’s what investors need to know about the evolving crypto cycle, liquidity trends, and institutional adoption.
For over a decade, cryptocurrency investors have taken comfort in a story that seems almost rhythmic: every four years, like clockwork, the market surges to dizzying highs before collapsing under its own exuberance. This four-year cycle became part of crypto folklore, anchored in Bitcoin’s built-in monetary schedule. Roughly every four years, Bitcoin’s network halves the reward paid to miners for validating transactions, cutting new supply in half. Historically, that reduction in issuance created a powerful supply shock, triggering a new wave of speculation and a bull market that lasted around 12 to 18 months. The cycle seemed dependable: 2013, 2017 and 2021 each delivered breath-taking rallies that ended in deep retracements. For a young asset class seeking pattern and predictability, it offered both. Many investors built strategies around it, buying ahead of the halving, selling near the expected peak and sitting out the subsequent “crypto winter.”
Yet behind that tidy narrative lay a more complex truth. The major turning points in Bitcoin’s history have also coincided with broader global liquidity cycles. When central banks were easing policy and expanding money supply, crypto boomed; when liquidity tightened, it crashed. The halving provided the spark, but the oxygen came from macroeconomics. That context matters today, because the conditions shaping the current cycle look unlike any that came before. We are once again approaching the period when, by the old calendar, a peak “should” arrive. But many of the fundamental drivers have changed, and they suggest that this time, the four-year playbook may not hold.
In every prior cycle, crypto’s euphoric phase ended when liquidity receded and the global economy turned late-cycle. In 2018, the Federal Reserve was tightening policy and shrinking its balance sheet. In 2022, the fastest rate-hiking campaign in 40 years drained risk appetite and sent digital assets tumbling. Today’s landscape is almost the reverse. Global money supply is rising again, not falling. Central banks from Washington to Beijing have shifted toward easing, and markets are pricing in further rate cuts through 2025. Meanwhile, fiscal deficits remain enormous. Governments are injecting demand into economies and, by extension, liquidity into markets.
The business cycle appears to be mid-stride rather than late. Growth has moderated but not collapsed, inflation has cooled from pandemic extremes, and central banks are more concerned about supporting activity than about choking it off. Historically, crypto’s sharpest drawdowns occurred when liquidity was withdrawn and credit tightened. That environment simply does not exist right now.
In fact, by some measures global M2, the broad money aggregate across major economies, has reached new highs. Analysts estimate that roughly five trillion dollars were added to global liquidity in the first half of 2025 alone. If past bull markets ended when money dried up, it is hard to argue that a similar drought is imminent.
Perhaps the most profound change in this cycle lies in who is participating. Crypto is no longer the playground of retail traders chasing momentum on unregulated exchanges. Large institutions, asset managers, family offices, pension funds and even corporations, now hold a meaningful share of the market.
The approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs in major jurisdictions opened the floodgates for traditional investors to gain exposure through familiar, regulated vehicles. Within months of launch, these ETFs amassed tens of billions of dollars in assets. Custodial infrastructure, audit standards and regulatory clarity have transformed the operational landscape.
That institutionalization is altering the market’s rhythm. Bitcoin’s realized volatility has steadily declined; its ownership base is shifting from speculative traders to long-term allocators who hold through cycles. In previous peaks, early “whales” often sold into retail frenzy, triggering rapid collapses. Now, many of those coins are being absorbed by institutions with multi-year mandates and rebalancing disciplines.
When a significant portion of supply sits in cold storage and investors think in years rather than weeks, the feedback loop of boom and bust weakens. Corrections still happen, this remains a volatile asset, but the amplitude of the cycle is softening. The market is behaving less like a speculative bubble machine and more like a maturing, globally traded asset class.
Adding to that structural shift are policy dynamics that few previous cycles enjoyed. The Federal Reserve has moved from fighting inflation to preparing for rate cuts. Real yields are falling, cash is losing appeal, and investors are again searching for returns in risk assets. Meanwhile, fiscal policy remains expansionary: large deficits, infrastructure spending and defence budgets are pumping trillions into the economy.
Those deficits have to be financed, meaning governments issue enormous volumes of debt. If demand for that debt lags, central banks often step in, directly or indirectly, to absorb supply, effectively creating new liquidity. In other words, fiscal profligacy can morph into another form of monetary easing.
For investors concerned about debt sustainability or long-term currency debasement, Bitcoin’s fixed supply becomes attractive. Some analysts describe the current phase as a liquidity-led super cycle: global money supply is expanding, real interest rates are falling, and investors are rotating toward assets with perceived scarcity. In that environment, the old four-year rhythm may stretch into something longer and less predictable.
Still, cycles die hard. The halving remains an immutable feature of Bitcoin’s code, and psychology around it can be self-fulfilling. Each halving renews media attention, retail interest and speculative momentum. If enough participants expect a surge and pile in, they can create the very rally they anticipate, and eventually the same over-extension that precedes a correction.
There is also the risk that macro tailwinds reverse. Inflation could re-accelerate, forcing central banks back into tightening mode. A geopolitical shock could drive a flight to safety, draining liquidity from risk assets. And while institutional participation stabilizes prices, it also links crypto more tightly to the broader risk-asset complex. If equities fall sharply, Bitcoin may no longer behave as an uncorrelated hedge but as another high-beta asset.
For institutional investors, these crosscurrents demand a new framework. The four-year halving model is no longer a sufficient guide. Instead, crypto must be analysed within the same macroeconomic context that governs equities, bonds and commodities.
That means watching liquidity indicators, real interest rates, fiscal trends and policy trajectories. It means viewing Bitcoin not just as a speculative trade but as a structural component of portfolios, a potential store of value in an age of high debt and shifting monetary regimes, and a high-beta expression of global liquidity cycles. For a deep dive into global liquidity trends, see IMF’s Global Financial Stability Report.
Allocating to crypto under this paradigm is less about timing a calendar event and more about understanding the interplay between money creation, risk appetite and institutional adoption. The discipline that traditional investors bring, position sizing, risk management, and valuation awareness, now matters more than ever.
Read more about Institutional Bitcoin Investing here.
Every investor knows those words can be dangerous. “This time is different” has preceded many bubbles. But it can also mark genuine regime change. The digital-asset market of 2025 operates within a financial system awash with liquidity, populated by professional investors, and increasingly integrated into global portfolios. The mechanical four-year cycle that once defined Bitcoin’s narrative may be giving way to a more complex, macro-driven pattern.
The halving still matters, but it is no longer destiny. What matters more is the flow of global capital, the stance of central banks, the sustainability of fiscal policy, and the evolving behaviour of long-term investors. If those forces remain supportive, the market could stay buoyant longer than anyone expects. And if they turn, the correction may be gentler, buffered by stronger hands and deeper liquidity. Either way, the crypto market’s evolution means the next chapter will not read quite like the last. For institutions evaluating their role in this space, the takeaway is simple: watch the liquidity, not the calendar!
Curious how these trends impact your portfolio? Let’s start a conversation.
October 3, 2025
5 min read
Central banks buy gold, Bitcoin gains traction, and the dollar declines—discover how these shifts are reshaping the global monetary system.
September 9, 2025
5 min read
The GENIUS Act marks a historic shift in U.S. crypto regulation, bringing stablecoins under federal oversight. Discover how this law reshapes digital finance
